Judges v Arbitrators Assessment of Acts of the Judiciary in Investment Arbitration and Reliance of Arbitration Tribunals on the Judiciary
Welcome to this session on judges versus arbitrators in investment arbitration. This panel brings together leading experts to explore the differences and similarities between these two roles, and how their training, independence, and decision-making methods shape case outcomes. The discussion highlights issues such as legitimacy, transparency, conflicts of interest, and the role of judicial versus arbitral discretion. Drawing on comparative examples and critical reflections, it examines whether the convergence of standards can strengthen trust in international dispute resolution. Join us as we uncover how the relationship between judges and arbitrators is evolving on the global stage.
